Acemoglu and Robinson set out to answer the question why are some nations rich and others poor? The book begins by analyzing Nogales Arizona and Nogales Mexico. In essence this is a city with a national border that divides one portion of the city from the other. The United States side of Nogales is far more prosperous and safe than the Mexican side. The authors attempt to explain why this is the case. Another example given is North and South Korea.
The authors next go through a few theories regarding why some nations succeed and others fail and explain why each of those theories is wrong. They included the geography hypothesis, the culture hypothesis, and the ignorance hypothesis.
The authors state “to understand world inequality we have to understand why some societies are organized in a very inefficient and socially undesirable ways.” They continued “poor countries are poor because those who have power make choices that create poverty. They get it wrong not by mistake or ignorance but on purpose.”
The authors outline numerous historical examples of successful and unsuccessful nations. They argue that successful nations have inclusive political and economic institutions and that poor nations have extractive political and economic institutions. One of the ways to secure inclusive institutions is to have secure property rights. They note that communism is extractive and it’s abhorrence of private property will always lead to poverty.
Innovation is necessary for wealth generation. Inclusive institutions allow for the creative destruction necessary for innovation and countries that are extractive stifle creative destruction.
This was a well researched book with numerous examples. At times it seemed repetitive. The book jumped from time period to time period and might be in Ancient Rome on one page and 18th century Europe on the next. I found their conclusion weak but overall it was a good book.
Overall I give this book 4 stars out of 5.
Thomas Aquinas is credited as one of the greatest proponents of natural law. During his time in Cologne he was taught by Albertus Magnus. Magnus used the teachings of Aristotle in his mentorship of Thomas Aquinas.
Samuel Adams believed in American Independence from Great Britain. He is one of the most well know Son's of Liberty. On August 1, 1776 he gave a speech to the Continental Congress in Philadelphia.
“Lest the land become desolate and the Christian name be destroyed there, we exhort and command the faithful to take up the sign of the cross and bring aid to the Christians established in Livonia.”
Pope Gregory IX
During the time of Alexander Nevsky why were western Catholic powers seen as a greater spiritual threat than the Mongols?
The Golden Horde ruled the principalities of Russia. Noble Russians were still allowed to serve as the princes of the great cities, but they owed their power to the Horde. A tribute system was established and in practice in 1262.
Those who collected the tax were known as the Besermeny. The were usually Muslim merchants or tax farmers working for the Golden Horde. They were foreigners and they were collecting the wealth of the native Russians. This made them hated. Prior to 1262 the Horde conducted a census in Russia to determine exactly what tributes needed to be paid. This had been met with great hostility.
In 1262 the besermeny had great power. The Russian chronicle notes that they “created great violence among the people.” It seems clear that they were willing to abuse their power to accomplish their jobs. In addition to monetary contributions by 1262 the Russian population also had to contribute their men to fight in the wars of the Golden Horde. This further angered the local ...
