Taibbi writes “This book is intended to help start a conversation about how much of our disdain for each other is real and how much of it is a product of the media machine.” Taibbi takes a very critical look at the current political media atmosphere in this book.
The book samples several ways that the media divides us. The book outlines the 10 rules of hate. For example rule number three is “Hate people not institutions.” The book also argues that political media has been set up to mimic a sporting event where you must always root for your team.
Taibbi notes “People need to start understanding the news not as the news but as just such an individualized consumer experience. Anger just for you. This is not reporting it is a marketing process designed to create rhetorical addictions and shut any non consumerist doors in your mind.”
The book contains information regarding sources, polling, Russia gate, Donald Trump and much more. He notes how the media typically distracts us from the important stories and notes “as people the more separate we are the more politically impotent we become.”
The book contains several entertaining stories. It also contains profanity throughout. Taibbi warns us “Today pockets of media consumers demonize each other calling for dueling crackdowns. We have become our worst enemies and the longer the cycles play out the more authoritarian our future will look.”
At times the book seemed long and some of the chapters could have been shorter but overall an interesting read. I rate this book 3.5 out of 5 stars.
William Wilberforce has been called an agitator for his commitment to ending the slave trade. One of his well known speeches on the subject was given on May 12, 1789.
Cardinal Richelieu has been hailed as a great statesman and as a subversive authoritarian. Depending on who you talk to he was a man needed to strengthen the monarchy in France, or he was a tyrant seeking personal power. Next week I will have a book review that may shed more light on Cardinal Richelieu.
When Lenin was working on his major writing projects he would often pace across the room formulating the ideas that he would write down by saying them out loud. Once he had the idea for what he wanted to write he would often repeat the idea to Nadezhda Krupskaya, who would provide feedback. Once this process was complete he would then write the ideas down.
Here is an AI rendering of what that might have looked like when he was drafting What is to be Done.
This month this community will focus on political subversion. What is subversion? When is it justified? What is the interplay between subversion and agitation? These are some of the topics to be discussed this month.
“You get used to the despot’s shortcomings, when they are not great vices, and the change of an autocratic ruler leads to involuntary fear.”
Sergei Trubetskoi
