It took me a while to pick this book up. I didn’t know anything about it and wasn’t sure if I would be interested. It sat around as I read other books but finally I decided to give it a try. I was hooked from the start.
Nix begins this story in the late 1990’s when Robert de La Rochefoucald takes the stand in defense of a man on trial for signing paperwork that sent train cars worth of French Jews to concentration camps. Rochefoucald had met the man in the 1960s and had the opportunity to ask him about the resistance in that area of the country. Rochefoucald had noticed that there were a large number of Jews fighting in the resistance in this area of the country. He asked why there were so many and had been told they had a man in the government who told them every time there was going to be a round up so that they could flee. Rochefoucald learned this man in the government was the same man on trial and so testified.
Nix then turns to the life of Rochefoucald and his exploits during World War II. He outlines how he was denounced by someone in his home town and was alerted to it by the mailman. The teenager Rochefoucald decided he had to flee to Britain. To do so he had to go south to Vichy France and then on to Spain.
After making it to Britain he trained with the British to become a Sabotuer. After the training was complete he parachuted back into France and began his work. He had numerous close calls and was detained by the nazis more than once but survived to lead a raid against the Nazis at the end of the war. He received numerous medals and honors for his time in the resistance and in the French Army.
Overall this is a great read. I rate it 5 out of 5 stars.
William Wilberforce has been called an agitator for his commitment to ending the slave trade. One of his well known speeches on the subject was given on May 12, 1789.
Cardinal Richelieu has been hailed as a great statesman and as a subversive authoritarian. Depending on who you talk to he was a man needed to strengthen the monarchy in France, or he was a tyrant seeking personal power. Next week I will have a book review that may shed more light on Cardinal Richelieu.
When Lenin was working on his major writing projects he would often pace across the room formulating the ideas that he would write down by saying them out loud. Once he had the idea for what he wanted to write he would often repeat the idea to Nadezhda Krupskaya, who would provide feedback. Once this process was complete he would then write the ideas down.
Here is an AI rendering of what that might have looked like when he was drafting What is to be Done.
This month this community will focus on political subversion. What is subversion? When is it justified? What is the interplay between subversion and agitation? These are some of the topics to be discussed this month.
“You get used to the despot’s shortcomings, when they are not great vices, and the change of an autocratic ruler leads to involuntary fear.”
Sergei Trubetskoi
