I stumbled across this title and given the short length quickly finished it. Unfortunately the introductory pages were probably the best.
Gay begins by outlining a lavish dinner at a meeting of the G-8. She then writes “in contrast to the diners at the G-8 Summit one billion people around the world are undernourished. Many millions more are starving, many of them babies. They lack the minimum amount of food for health and growth. Yet farmers and ranchers produce more than enough food every year to feed everyone on earth but much of that food does not get the people who need it most. In some places food has become a precious item almost like gold.”
Gay also notes “The main cause of hunger and starvation is poverty. Around the world one billion people live on less than $1 per day. Poverty itself is the result of many things including social inequalities, government corruption and global economics. These same forces often prevent food supplies from reaching the people who need them.”
Gay quickly jumps from topic to topic and does a great job of providing statistics. Gay outlines ideas like the SNAP challenge and the correlation between poverty and obesity.
Gay has a negative view of factory farming. Next Gay turns her attention to climate change, with a focus on water and how higher temperatures will lead to drought and rising oceans. She notes that LA, New York, and Miami could end up under water. Gay also addresses genetic engineering of food and animals, food politics, and food as a weapon.
Gay concludes by advocating sustainable agriculture, eating insects, and organic farming.
This book reads mostly like a fact sheet and it lacks the depth that I would like to see. If the author is going to advocate for eating insects or a pill for food then there needs to be a more robust discussion about why that is necessary. Gay has a negative outlook for the future and wants everyone to adapt to her standards to save the world but she is not convincing in her approach. She mentions prominent cities that could end up under water but makes no attempt to explore innovations that could prevent that even if the sea rose to the levels she predicts.
Overall this book asks some very important questions at the beginning but does not adequately answer them. It goes from a promising start to a poor ending. I rate this book 2 out of 5 stars.
Great literature should do more than entertain us. It should provide a roadmap to improving our lives.
In A Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens introduced readers to Sydney Carton, one of literature's most compelling and deeply flawed characters. Dickens also gives him an unusual title: the Jackal.
His struggles raise questions that remain relevant today.
Are we defined by our past mistakes? Can we overcome our weaknesses? What separates the people we are from the people we could become?
Lessons From the Jackal is a 25-day character study exploring these questions through Sydney Carton’s life, decisions, relationships, and personal development.
This is not a traditional course on A Tale of Two Cities. Our reading assignments will focus specifically on Carton, with sufficient background provided to understand his story. No previous knowledge of the novel is necessary.
Each day will feature selected readings, historical comparisons, reflection questions, discussions, and practical challenges ...
Throughout this week, we have considered several different expressions of courage. We examined the courage required to speak honestly, the courage to seek reconciliation, and the importance of distinguishing courageous action from reckless behavior. Now, as we conclude our study of courage, Sydney Carton provides us with another example.
He has come to France.
This decision may appear relatively simple when compared with the dramatic events unfolding around him. Carton has not rescued anyone. He has not defeated an enemy or overcome the institutions threatening Charles Darnay's life. He has simply arrived.
Yet his arrival represents something important. For years, Carton has insisted that he is incapable of accomplishing anything worthwhile. He has repeatedly described himself as a disappointment and suggested that meaningful change is beyond his reach. But when someone he cares about faces grave danger, Carton does not use his own inadequacies as an excuse for remaining uninvolved. He acts.
We ...
