A Forum for Ideas
Education • News • Books
Interact, share ideas, and take action!

A Forum for Ideas is a place to discuss ideas and then act to put those ideas into motion. Each month a new topic will be introduced. There will be daily discussion questions to spark conversations, a quote of the day, and much more. Come join the discussion and start sharing your Ideas!
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
Op-Ed Reaction

Today’s Op-Ed reaction comes from the article

Two Decades After 9/11, It’s Looking Like American Democracy Won’t Survive the 2024 Election
By Austin Sarat published on Verdict Justia on September 11

https://verdict.justia.com/2023/09/11/two-decades-after-9-11-its-looking-like-american-democracy-wont-survive-the-2024-election

Sarat begins the article by stating American democracy barely survived the election of 2020 and blames the authoritarianism of the Republican Party for that. Sarat then pessimistically states that American democracy will not survive 2024.

Since this is the introductory paragraph I don’t mind assertions without evidence but the rest of the article needs to show how democracy barely survived 2020 and why it will not survive 2024. Sarat does not provide that evidence.

Sarat blames President Donald Trump for destroying Democracy. He notes “ Donald Trump is seeding the ground of skepticism and doubt about the integrity of the 2024 contest. In 2020, he spent months denouncing the use of mail-in ballots and raising questions about the procedures that would be used to determine the winner of the election.”

Sarat falls to mention anything about the Time magazine article The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election. If democracy was in danger in 2020 I would think a shadow campaign to ensure a certain result would be worth mentioning.

Sarat then goes on to outline numerous statements made by President Trump regarding his indictments as proof that President Trump is trying to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2024 election. Sarat notes that it is not just President Trump but also his allies like Speaker McCarthy, former Governors Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin who have questioned election integrity.

Sarat writes “ It looks like Trump is succeeding again in throwing America into an Alice-in-Wonderland world, where a person who is guilty of election interference presents himself as a defender of election integrity and a victim of election interference.”

It is sad that Sarat would presume guilt over innocence. To my knowledge President Trump has not been convicted in a court of law. One of the tenets of American democracy is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. If Sarat’s vision of democracy relies on a guilty until proven innocent standard then perhaps it is not a democracy that should be widely embraced.

Sarat looks at what America would look like if President Trump loses including references to the Proud Boys rioting. He does not address what Antifa might do if President Trump wins. He only notes if President Trump wins there won’t ever be another free and fair election.

Sarat holds the view that his version of democracy is the only one that supports the rule of law. Therefore when 49% of respondents disagree with him and believe the charges against President Trump were politically motivated it is bad news for Americans.

Sarat is a partisan writer who did not write a compelling article. He neglected to compare the fragility of the 2024 election to other contested elections in our history such as 1800 or 1876. He didn’t even touch on the 1860 election. If the United States could survive those elections it will surely survive 2024.

Sarat can only see President Trump as a tyrant and therefore is incapable of writing an article of sufficient depth about the threats to democracy in the 2024 election.

Read the article above and let me know your thoughts.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Posts
Articles
Silence Dogood and the Freedom of Speech

On July 9, 1722 the New England Courant published a letter from Silence Dogood. The letter stated in part:

“Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as publick Liberty, without Freedom of Speech; which is the Right of every Man, as far as by it, he does not hurt or controul the Right of another: And this is the only Check it ought to suffer, and the only Bounds it ought to know.
“This sacred Privilege is so essential to free Governments, that the Security of Property, and the Freedom of Speech always go together; and in those wretched Countries where a Man cannot call his Tongue his own, he can scarce call any Thing else his own.”

Silence Dogood was the pen name Benjamin Franklin used for a series of letters that he wrote. Franklin outlines the importance of freedom of speech above. If freedom of speech is curtailed it is only a matter of time before every other right will be taken as well. In the letter Franklin continued by saying:

“The best ...

Quote of the Day

“It's the beauty within us that makes it possible for us to recognize the beauty around us. The question is not what you look at but what you see.”

Henry David Thoreau

Question

What does it mean to be free?

My FOREX Journey
An Idea Begins to Form
Inflation was soaring, talks of recession were incessant and I had some money that hadn’t been spent on bills yet. It was time to invest. But what would I invest in?  The stock market didn’t seem appealing. The price of bitcoin was dropping and as much as I would like to own a game used Bryce
Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals