A Forum for Ideas
Education • News • Books
Interact, share ideas, and take action!

A Forum for Ideas is a place to discuss ideas and then act to put those ideas into motion. Each month a new topic will be introduced. There will be daily discussion questions to spark conversations, a quote of the day, and much more. Come join the discussion and start sharing your Ideas!
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
Op-Ed Reaction

Today’s Op-Ed reaction comes from the article

Two Decades After 9/11, It’s Looking Like American Democracy Won’t Survive the 2024 Election
By Austin Sarat published on Verdict Justia on September 11

https://verdict.justia.com/2023/09/11/two-decades-after-9-11-its-looking-like-american-democracy-wont-survive-the-2024-election

Sarat begins the article by stating American democracy barely survived the election of 2020 and blames the authoritarianism of the Republican Party for that. Sarat then pessimistically states that American democracy will not survive 2024.

Since this is the introductory paragraph I don’t mind assertions without evidence but the rest of the article needs to show how democracy barely survived 2020 and why it will not survive 2024. Sarat does not provide that evidence.

Sarat blames President Donald Trump for destroying Democracy. He notes “ Donald Trump is seeding the ground of skepticism and doubt about the integrity of the 2024 contest. In 2020, he spent months denouncing the use of mail-in ballots and raising questions about the procedures that would be used to determine the winner of the election.”

Sarat falls to mention anything about the Time magazine article The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election. If democracy was in danger in 2020 I would think a shadow campaign to ensure a certain result would be worth mentioning.

Sarat then goes on to outline numerous statements made by President Trump regarding his indictments as proof that President Trump is trying to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2024 election. Sarat notes that it is not just President Trump but also his allies like Speaker McCarthy, former Governors Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin who have questioned election integrity.

Sarat writes “ It looks like Trump is succeeding again in throwing America into an Alice-in-Wonderland world, where a person who is guilty of election interference presents himself as a defender of election integrity and a victim of election interference.”

It is sad that Sarat would presume guilt over innocence. To my knowledge President Trump has not been convicted in a court of law. One of the tenets of American democracy is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. If Sarat’s vision of democracy relies on a guilty until proven innocent standard then perhaps it is not a democracy that should be widely embraced.

Sarat looks at what America would look like if President Trump loses including references to the Proud Boys rioting. He does not address what Antifa might do if President Trump wins. He only notes if President Trump wins there won’t ever be another free and fair election.

Sarat holds the view that his version of democracy is the only one that supports the rule of law. Therefore when 49% of respondents disagree with him and believe the charges against President Trump were politically motivated it is bad news for Americans.

Sarat is a partisan writer who did not write a compelling article. He neglected to compare the fragility of the 2024 election to other contested elections in our history such as 1800 or 1876. He didn’t even touch on the 1860 election. If the United States could survive those elections it will surely survive 2024.

Sarat can only see President Trump as a tyrant and therefore is incapable of writing an article of sufficient depth about the threats to democracy in the 2024 election.

Read the article above and let me know your thoughts.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Posts
Articles
Writing Prompt - Write a story about a secret group or society.

Paris Grimm stepped out of his Rolls Royce Black Badge Cullinan and pulled his sunglasses over his eyes. His personally customized $1,350,000 SUV, his sunglasses, and his suit matched in a perfect shade of jet black. As he stepped toward the nondescript building ahead of him his entourage of four body guards flanked him on both sides. 

As they approached the building they were greeted by a single man also dressed in a black suit. 

“State your business.”

“I am here to see the Master.”

“State the oath.  All of you in unison.”

“Is that necessary?”

“Do you wish to see his eminence? Are you prepared to walk down the dark corridor? If so you must state the oath now or I will ask you to leave.”

Paris Grimm stared at the weasel of a man blocking his admittance and imagined him strapped to a board while his flesh was peeled from his skin. A door man for the Master had no right to issue orders to the most powerful lieutenant in the organization. Especially not today. Today Paris Grimm was going to become the Master. 

Several seconds passed in silence before the weasel spoke again. “I will inform ...

Quote of the Day

“We too often bind ourselves by authorities rather than by the truth.”

Lucretia Mott

Question

What is activism?

My FOREX Journey
An Idea Begins to Form
Inflation was soaring, talks of recession were incessant and I had some money that hadn’t been spent on bills yet. It was time to invest. But what would I invest in?  The stock market didn’t seem appealing. The price of bitcoin was dropping and as much as I would like to own a game used Bryce
Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals